Keywords
sentience
fish
food
animal welfare
Abstract
In recent decades, also driven by the European Union, aquaculture has undergone significant development to meet the increasing demand for seafood products. However, the concentration of efforts and resources in the fishing industry raises complex ethical issues that have yet to be fully explored, concerning animal welfare, environmental impact, and social justice. Balancing economic interests with environmental and ethical concerns is a challenging yet crucial task to ensuring a sustainable future for aquaculture. The adoption of ethical values in the fishing industry not only promotes sustainability but also fosters consumer trust in responsible food sourcing. Interventions such as developing animal welfare standards, implementing sustainable farming techniques, adopting environmental management policies, and promoting ethically responsible business practices are pivotal. A multidimensional approach is essential to ensure an ethical and sustainable future for aquaculture, critical for global food security and marine environmental well-being. This holistic approach requires collaborative efforts from various stakeholders, including policymakers, researchers, industry players, and consumers, to address the multifaceted challenges faced by the aquaculture sector. Additionally, raising awareness among consumers about the impact of their choices on the environment and animal welfare can further drive the demand for ethically produced seafood and encourage responsible practices within the industry.
References
Metz S, Claudet J. Research for PECH Committee – Workshop on the European Green Deal − Challenges and opportunities for EU fisheries and aquaculture – Part II: Marine biodiversity aspects, European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Brussels; 2023. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2023/747295/IPOL_STU(2023)747295_EN.pdf. Accessed on 8/11/2023.
Aquaculture Advisory Council. The provision of ecosystem services by European aquaculture. Brussels: Aquaculture Advisory Council (AAC); 2021. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.25607/OBP-1707.
Gallardi D. Effects of bivalve aquaculture on the environment and their possible mitigation: a review. Fish Aquac J 2014;5:3. doi: 10.4172/2150-3508.1000105.
Filgueira R, Guyondet T, Comeau LA, Tremblay R. Bivalve aquaculture-environment interactions in the context of climate change. Glob Chang Biol 2016;22(12):3901-13. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13346.
European Parliament. Aquaculture production in the European Union. 2023. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/120/aquaculture-production-in-the-european-union. Accessed on 8/11/2023.
European Commission. COM(2021) 236 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Strategic guidelines for a more sustainable and competitive EU aquaculture for the period 2021 to 2030. 2021; Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:bab1f9a7-b30b-11eb-8aca-01aa75ed71a1.0022.02/DOC_1&format=PDFAccessed on 8/11/2023.
Dara M, Carbonara P, La Corte C, Parrinello D, Cammarata M, Parisi MG. Fish Welfare in Aquaculture: Physiological and Immunological Activities for Diets, Social and Spatial Stress on Mediterranean Aqua Cultured Species. Fishes 2023;8(8):414. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8080414.
Segner H, Reiser S, Ruane N, Rösch R, Steinhagen D, Vehanen, T. Welfare of fishes in aquaculture. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular N. C1189. Budapest: FAO; 2019.
Martini M, Penco S, Baldelli I, Biolatti B, Ciliberti R. An ethics for the living world: Operation methods of animal ethics committees in Italy. Ann Ist 2015;51(3):244-7. doi: 10.4415/ANN_15_03_13.
Standing Committee of the European Convention for the Protection of Animals kept for farming Purposes (T-AP). Recommendation concerning farmed fish. 5 December 2005; Available at: https://www.coe.int/t/e/legal_affairs/legal_co-operation/biological_safety_and_use_of_animals/Farming/Rec%20fish%20E.asp. Accessed on 1/11/2023.
World Organisation for Animal Health. Protecting animals, preserving our future. Aquatic Animal Health Code. 22th ed. 2019. Available at: https://rr-europe.woah.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/oie-aqua-code_2019_en.pdf. Accessed on 1/11/2023.
Directive 2008/56/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02008L0056-20170607&from=PL. Accessed on 1/11/2023.
Italian Committee for Bioethics. Bioethics and veterinary science, animal well-being and human health. 2001; Available at: https://bioetica.governo.it/en/opinions/opinions-responses/bioethics-and-veterinary-science-animal-well-being-and-human-health/. Accessed on 1/11/2023.
Ciliberti R, Monteleone R, Bandini, P Alfano L. The constitutional protection of animals, the environment, biodiversity, and ecosystems. Let’s change: an invitation collected. Medicina Hist 2022;6(S1):e2022025.
Baldelli I, Biolatti, B, Santi P, Murialdo G, Bassi AM, Santori G, Ciliberti R. Conscientious objection to animal testing: a preliminary survey among Italian medical and veterinary students. Alternatives to laboratory animals: ATLA 2019;47(1):30-8. doi: 10.1177/0261192919840452.
Rose JD, Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ, Diggles BK, Sawynok W, Stevens ED, Wynne CDL. Can fish really feel pain?. Fish Fish 2014;15:97-133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12010.
Sneddon LU. Pain perception in fish: indicators and endpoints. ILAR J. 2009;50(4):338-42. doi: 10.1093/ilar.50.4.338.
Schroeder P. Pain sensitivity in fish. CAB Rev 2018;13(049):1-6. Available at: doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR201813049.
Sneddon LU. Evolution of nociception and pain: evidence from fish models. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2019;374(1785):20190290. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0290.
Huntingford FA, Adams C, Braithwaite V, Kadri S, Pottinger T, Sandøe P, Turnbull J. Current issues in fish welfare. J Fish Biol 2007;70(4):1311-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2006.001046.x.
European Commision. Animal welfare. Eurobarometer: Attitudes of Europeans towards animal welfare. 2023. Available at: https://food.ec.europa.eu/animals/animal-welfare_en. Accessed on 1/11/2023.
Toni M, Manciocco A, Angiulli E, Alleva E, Cioni C, Malavasi S. Review: Assessing fish welfare in research and aquaculture, with a focus on European directives. Animal 2019;13(1):161–70. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118000940.
Ashley PJ. Fish welfare: current issues in aquaculture. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2007;104:199–235. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.09.001.
Torgerson-White L, Sánchez-Suárez W. Looking beyond the Shoal: Fish Welfare as an Individual Attribute. Animals (Basel) 2022;12(19):2592. doi: 10.3390/ani12192592.
Comitato Bioetico per la Veterinaria e l’agroalimentare nella acquacoltura. Acquacoltura: profili bioetici e biogiuridici. 2020. Available at: https://www.istitutoibva.it/wp/Doc%20Acquacoltura.pdf. Accessed on 1/11/2023.
Brambell FWR. Report of the technical committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock husbandry systems. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1965.
Grigorakis K. Ethical Issues in Aquaculture Production. J Agric Environ Ethics 2010;23(4):345-70. doi: 10.1007/s10806-009-9210-5.
Nicheva S, Waldo S, Nielsen R, Lasner T, Guillen J, Jackson E, Motova A, Cozzolino M, Lamprakis A, Zhelev K, Llorente I. Collecting demographic data for the EU aquaculture sector: What can we learn?. Aquaculture 2022; 559:738382. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738382.