Keywords
artificial intelligence
mental disorder
ethics
psychotherapy
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has rapidly advanced in various domains, including its application in psychotherapy. AI-powered psychotherapy tools present promising solutions for increasing accessibility to mental health care. However, the integration of AI in psychotherapy raises significant ethical concerns that require thorough consideration and regulation to ensure ethical practice, patient safety, and data privacy. This article discusses the ethical considerations surrounding the utilization of AI in psychotherapy, emphasizing the need for responsible implementation, patient privacy, and the human-AI interaction.
The challenge raised by the use of artificial intelligence requires a comprehensive approach. Schools, in particular, are crucial in providing both knowledge and ethical guidance, helping young individuals decipher the complexities of online content. Additionally, parental support is essential, requiring the provision of time, fostering relationships, encouraging dialogue, and creating a safe environment to share experiences amidst the intricacies of adolescence. Reimagining social and healthcare services tailored for adolescents is equally crucial, taking into account recent societal changes. The integration of AI in psychotherapy has vast potential to transform mental healthcare. However, ensuring its accuracy and effectiveness demands a proactive approach to address associated ethical considerations. By adopting responsible practices, preserving patient autonomy, and continually refining AI systems, the field can leverage the benefits of AI in psychotherapy while maintaining high ethical standards.
References
References
Yan WJ, Ruan QN, Jiang K. Challenges for Artificial Intelligence in Recognizing Mental Disorders. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;13(1):2. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010002.
Ciliberti R, Schiavone V, Alfano L. Artificial intelligence and the caring relationship: ethical profiles. Medicina Hist 2023;7:e2023016.
Manríquez Roa T, Biller-Andorno N, Trachsel M. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Psychotherapy. Oxford Handbook of Psychotherapy Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198817338.001.0001.
Swartz HA, Novick DM. Psychotherapy in- the Digital Age: What We Can Learn From Interpersonal Psychotherapy Am J Psychother 2020;73(1):15-21. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20190040
Fiorentino V, Romakkaniemi M, Harrikari T, Saraniemi S, Tiitinen L. Towards digitally mediated social work – the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on encountering clients in social work. Qual Soc Work 2023;22(3), 448-64. doi: 10.1177/14733250221075603
Stoll J, Müller JA, Trachsel M. Ethical Issues in Online Psychotherapy: A Narrative Review. Front Psychiatry 2020;10:993. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00993.
Orsolini L, Pompili S, Salvi V, Volpe U. A Systematic Review on TeleMental Health in Youth Mental Health: Focus on Anxiety, Depression and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021;31;57(8):793. doi: 10.3390/medicina57080793.
Mortimer R, Somerville MP, Mechler J, Lindqvist K, Leibovich L, Guerrero-Tates B, Edbrooke-Childs J, Martin P, Midgley N. Connecting over the internet: Establishing the therapeutic alliance in an internet-based treatment for depressed adolescents. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2022;27(3):549-68. doi:10.1177/13591045221081193.
Khalaf A M, Alubied A A, Khalaf A M, Rifaey AA. Impact of Social Media on the Mental Health of Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2023;15(8):e42990. doi:10.7759/cureus.42990
Berler M, Trub L, Magaldi D. The therapist's evolving public self in a digitally disrupted marketplace. J Psychother Integr 2023;33(3):285-301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000295.
Binswanger L. Il problema dello spazio in psicopatologia. Molaro A, editor. Macerata: Quodlibet; 2022.
Weightman M. Digital psychotherapy as an effective and timely treatment option for depression and anxiety disorders: Implications for rural and remote practice. J Int Med Res 2020;48(6):300060520928686. doi: 10.1177/0300060520928686.
Renn BN, Hoeft TJ, Lee HS, Bauer AM, Areán PA. Preference for in-person psychotherapy versus digital psychotherapy options for depression: survey of adults in the U.S. NPJ Digit Med 2019;11;2:6. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0077-1.
McDonald A, Eccles JA, Fallahkhair S, Critchley HD. Online psychotherapy: trailblazing digital healthcare. BJPsych Bull 2020;44(2):60-6. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2019.66.
Fredum HG, Rost F, Ulberg R, Midgley N, Thorén A, Aker JFD, Johansen HF, Sandvand L, Tosterud L, Dahl HJ. Psychotherapy Dropout: Using the Adolescent Psychotherapy Q-Set to Explore the Early In-Session Process of Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy. Front Psychol 2021;22;12:708401. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708401.
Cohen K A, Schleider JL. Adolescent dropout from brief digital mental health interventions within and beyond randomized trials, Internet Interv 2002;27:100496. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100496.
de Bruin EJ , Meijer AM. The impact of online therapeutic feedback on outcome measures in Internet-CBTI for adolescents with insomnia. Sleep Med 2017;29:68-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2016.05.017.
Victor P, Krug I, Vehoff C, Lyons N, Willutzki U. Strengths-based CBT: Internet-Based Versus Face-to-Face Therapy in A Randomized Controlled Trial. Depression Anxiety 2018;7:2. doi 10.4172/2167-1044.1000301
Imondi V. I Conscious: L'Inconscio connettivo: Psicopatologia delle masse nell'era di Internet e analisi dell'Io digitale; 2020.
Busuioc M. Accountable Artificial Intelligence: Holding Algorithms to Account. Public Adm Rev 2021;81(5):25-836. doi: 10.1111/puar.13293.
LL. Santoro E. La digital health a supporto della professione medica. Ric&Pra 2021;37(1):15-22. doi 10.1707/3556.35319.
Khan NZ, Javed MA. Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Strategies for Assessing Suicidal Behavior and Mental Illness: A Literature Review. Cureus. 2022;14(7):e27225. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27225.
Menon V, Vijayakumar L. Artificial intelligence-based approaches for suicide prediction: Hope or hype? Asian J Psychiatr 2023;88:103728. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103728.
Di Leo D. Terapie digitali ed intelligenza artificiale, applicazioni pratiche e quadro normativo. Tendenze nuove 2021;2:3-11. doi: 10.32032.
Bauer M, Glenn T, Monteith S, Bauer R, Whybrow PC, Geddes J. Ethical perspectives on recommending digital technology for patients with mental illness. Int J Bipolar Disord 2017;5(1):1-14. doi: 10.1186/s40345-017-0073-9.
Lehtimaki S, Martic J, Wahl B, Foster KT, Schwalbe N. Evidence on Digital Mental Health Interventions for Adolescents and Young People: Systematic Overview. JMIR Ment Health 2021; 29;8(4):e25847. doi: 10.2196/25847.
Licata M, Larentis O, Tesi C, Fusco R, Ciliberti R. Tourism in the time of Coronavirus. Fruition of the “minor heritage” through the development of bioarchaeological sites, our proposal. Tourism Management 2020;21:19. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4020042.
Lancini M. Il ritiro sociale degli adolescenti. La solitudine di una generazione iperconnessa. Milano: Raffaello Cortina; 2019.
Polli Charmet P. Fragili e spavaldi: ritratto degli adolescenti di oggi. Bari: Laterza ed. 2010.
Opel DJ, Kious BM, Cohen IG. AI as a Mental Health Therapist for Adolescents. JAMA Pediatr 2023. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.
Gulino M, Patuzzo S, Baldelli I, Gazzaniga V, Merlo DF, Maiorana L, Murialdo G, Picozzi M, Armocida G, Cattorini P,Montaguti E, Bonometti S, Grossi AA, DeStefano F, Ciliberti R. Bioethics in Italian medical and healthcare education. A pilot study. Acta Biomed 2018;89(4):519-31. doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i4.7238.
Ciliberti R, Alfano L, Baldelli I, De Stefano F, Bonsignore A. Self-determination, healthcare treatment and minors in Italian clinical practice: ethical, psychological, juridical and medical–legal profiles. Acta Biomed 2018;89(1):34-40. doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i1.6368.