A screening focusing on alcohol consumption withdrawal effects in student’s population
PDF

Keywords

Alcohol drinking
college students
prevention
alcohol misuse
screening tool

Abstract

Introduction: Students overestimate alcohol consumption of those around them and underestimate their own, so that quantitative approach may not be the most relevant to assess students’ drinking. The main objective was to provide an appropriate tool for screening students’ drinking.  

Methods: A multicentre cross-sectional survey was conducted by internet between February and June, 2013 in France. Thirteen questions explored alcohol consumption of which 8 concerned withdrawal effects (4 items of the AUDIT) and alcohol behaviour (CAGE test). A multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was conducted to identify profiles of student’s alcohol consumption. Partitioning methods were used to group students according to their mode of alcohol use. The most relevant items included in the MCA were identified. Three questions were identified as most pertinent among the students with potential drinking problems and ranked by a decision tree with the Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detector method. Finally, the generalization of our model was assessed.

Results: A total of 36,427 students participated in the survey: 25,679 females (70.5% of respondents), sex ratio 0.42 and mean aged 21.2 (sd 3.7 years). Among those who had experimented with alcohol (N=33,113), three consumption profiles were identified: “simple/non-use” (66.9%), “intermediate consumption” (25.9%) and “problem drinking” (7.2%)  Instead, for the latter group, the three most relevant items were (Q20) "not able to stop drinking after starting”, (Q21) "failed to do what was normally expected”, and (Q23) "unable to remember what happened the night before”.

Conclusions: Healthcare professionals have a screening tool of three items for students’ drinking.

https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2018.59.1.780
PDF

References

Hingson R, Heeren T, Winter M, Wechsler H. Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24: changes from 1998 to 2001. Annu. Rev. Public Health. 2005;26:259‑79.

Hingson RW, Zha W, Weitzman ER. Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24, 1998-2005. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2009;12‑20.

Saewyc EM, Brown D, Plane M, Mundt MP, Zakletskaia L, Wiegel J, et al. Gender differences in violence exposure among university students attending campus health clinics in the United States and Canada. J. Adolesc. Health Off. Publ. Soc. Adolesc. Med. 2009;45:587‑94.

Northcote J, Livingston M. Accuracy of self-reported drinking: observational verification of « last occasion » drink estimates of young adults. Alcohol Alcohol. Oxf. Oxfs. 2011;46:709‑13.

Garnett C, Crane D, West R, Michie S, Brown J, Winstock A. Normative misperceptions about alcohol use in the general population of drinkers: a cross-sectional survey. Addict. Behav. 2015;42:203‑6.

Cunningham JA, Neighbors C, Wild TC, Humphreys K. Normative misperceptions about alcohol use in a general population sample of problem drinkers from a large metropolitan city. Alcohol Alcohol. Oxf. Oxfs. 2012;47:63‑6.

Wild TC. Personal drinking and sociocultural drinking norms: a representative population study. J. Stud. Alcohol. 2002;63:469‑75.

American College Health Association. The ACHA-National College Health Assessment II survey- Spring 2015 Reference Group Executive Summary. American College Health Association; 2015 p. 20.

Neighbors C, Dillard AJ, Lewis MA, Bergstrom RL, Neil TA. Normative misperceptions and temporal precedence of perceived norms and drinking. J. Stud. Alcohol. 2006;67:290‑9.

Kypri K, Langley JD. Perceived social norms and their relation to university student drinking. J. Stud. Alcohol. 2003;64:829‑34.

Cortés-Tomás M-T, Giménez-Costa J-A, Motos-Sellés P, Sancerni-Beitia M-D. Different versions of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as screening instruments for underage binge drinking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;158:52‑9.

Blank M-L, Connor J, Gray A, Tustin K. Screening for hazardous alcohol use among university students using individual questions from the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2015;

Cortés-Tomás M-T, Giménez-Costa J-A, Motos-Sellés P, Sancerni-Beitia M-D. Different versions of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as screening instruments for underage binge drinking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;158:52‑9.

Demartini KS, Carey KB. Optimizing the use of the AUDIT for alcohol screening in college students. Psychol. Assess. 2012;24:954‑63.

Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Arch. Intern. Med. 1998;158:1789‑95.

Hibell B, Guttormsson U, Ahlström S, Balakireva O, Bjarnason T, Kokkevi A, et al. The 2011 ESPAD Report. Substance use among students in 36 European Countries. The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs (CAN); 2011 p. 394.

⭐La santé mentale des jeunes en insertion [Internet]. [cité 11 mars 2016]. Disponible sur: http://docplayer.fr/6496053-La-sante-mentale-des-jeunes-en-insertion.html

Office Français des Drogues et Toxicomanies. Cannabis, alcool, tabac et autres drogues à la find e l’adolescence : usages et évolutions récentes ESCAPAD 2003. OFDT - Paris. 2004;4.

Richard J-B, Palle C, Guignard R, Nguyen-Thanh V, Beck F, Arwidson. La consommation d’alcool en France en 2014. Evolutions. 2015;6.

Mayfield D, McLeod G, Hall P. The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. Am. J. Psychiatry. 1974;131:1121‑3.

European Commission. EU citizens’ attitudes towards alcohol [Internet]. 2010 p. 129. Report No.: 331. Disponible sur: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb_special_339_320_en.htm

Richard J-B, Beck F, Spilka F. Alcohol consumption among young adults (18-25 years) in 2010 in France: specificities and trends since 2005. Bull. Epidémiologique Hebd. 2013;16–17.

American College Health Association. American College Health Association- National College Health Assessment Spring 2014 Reference Group Executive Summary. 2014 p. 19 pages.

Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE, Miech RA. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2013: Volume II, college students and adults ages 19-55. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan; 2014.

Wilson GB, Lock CA, Heather N, Cassidy P, Christie MM, Kaner EFS. Intervention against excessive alcohol consumption in primary health care: a survey of GPs’ attitudes and practices in England 10 years on. Alcohol Alcohol. Oxf. Oxfs. 2011;46:570‑7.

Blanquet M, Peyrol F, Morel F, Morge A, Maradeix B, Gerbaud L, et al. Prévalence du mésusage de l’alcool et attitudes des médecins libéraux. Alcoologie et Addictologie. 2015;37:105‑13.

Geisner IM, Varvil-Weld L, Mittmann AJ, Mallett K, Turrisi R. Brief web-based intervention for college students with comorbid risky alcohol use and depressed mood: does it work and for whom? Addict. Behav. 2015;42:36‑43.

Georgie J M, Sean H, Deborah M C, Matthew H, Rona C. Peer-led interventions to prevent tobacco, alcohol and/or drug use among young people aged 11-21 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addict. Abingdon Engl. 2016;111:391‑407.

Robertson-Boersma D, Butt P, Dell CA. Reflections on How a University Binge Drinking Prevention Initiative Supports Alcohol Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral for Student Alcohol Use. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2015;88:339‑46.

Ridout B, Campbell A. Using Facebook to deliver a social norm intervention to reduce problem drinking at university. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014;33:667‑73.

Scaglione NM, Mallett KA, Turrisi R, Reavy R, Cleveland MJ, Ackerman S. Who Will Experience the Most Alcohol Problems in College? The Roles of Middle and High School Drinking Tendencies. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2015;39:2039‑46.