Smoke-free environment policy in Vietnam: What did people see and how did they react when they visited various public places?


GATS (Global adults tobacco survey)
SHS (Secondhand smoke)
Smoke-free environment policy
Smoke-free regulations


Introduction: Since Vietnam has signed WHO framework on tobacco control (FCTC) in 2003 and has issued tobacco control law in 2013, there has been little research concerning about what impacts smoke-free regulations have had on public compliance. The objective of this study was to assess public exposure to secondhand smoke and reaction toward smoke-free policy regulations in Vietnam and the associated factor.

Methods: Using the design of GATS (Global Adult Tobacco Survey), a nationally representative sample of 8,996 adults were approached for data collection. Logistic regression was used to examine the associated factor.

Results: The study revealed that the prevalence of respondents exposed to secondhand smoke was much higher in bars/café/tea shops (90.07%) and restaurants (81.81%) than in any other public places, universities (36.70%), government buildings (31.12%), public transport (20.04%), healthcare facilities (17.85%) and schools (15.84%). 13.23% of respondents saw smokers violate smoke-free regulations. Among those who saw them violate smoke-free regulations, just one-third cautioned them to stop smoking. Strikingly, a higher rate of cautioning smokers to stop smoking was observed among the older, married, and better educated respondents. Respondents who were married, better educated and in lower economic status were more likely to remind smokers to stop smoking.

Conclusions: The study has called for strengthening two of the six MPOWER (Monitor, Protect, Offer, Warn, Enforce and Raise) components of the tobacco free initiative introduced by WHO, Monitoring tobacco use and prevention policies and Protecting people from tobacco smoke.


WHO, WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2009: The MPOWER Package. 2009.

WHO, WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2015: Raising taxes on tobacco. 2015: Geneva, Switzerland.

Fichtenberg, C.M. and S.A. Glantz, Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review. BMJ, 2002. 325(7357): p. 188.

Levy, D.T., F. Chaloupka, and J. Gitchell, The effects of tobacco control policies on smoking rates: a tobacco control scorecard. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 2004. 10(4): p. 338-353.

Brown, A., C. Moodie, and G. Hastings, A longitudinal study of policy effect (smoke-free legislation) on smoking norms: ITC Scotland/United Kingdom. Nicotine and Tobaccp Research, 2009. 11(8): p. 924-932.

Fallin A., Goodin A., Rayens M.K., Morris S., Hahn E.J., Smoke-free policy implementation: theoretical and practical considerations. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 2014. 15(3-4): p. 81-92.

WHO, MPOWER in action. 2013.

Hyland A., Barnoya J, and Corral J.E, Smoke-free air policies: past, present and future. Tobacco Control, 2012. 21(2): p. 154-161.

Pinkas J, Szymański J, Poznański D, Wierzba W. Smoke-free policy in Poland on the example of the implementation into national law of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2014/40 /EU of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the production, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products, and repealing Directive 2001/37/WE. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 2016. 23(3): p. 395-398.

Chapman S, Japanese street smoking bans: a Japan Tobacco foil to prevent clean indoor air policy? Tobacco Control, 2009. 18(5): p. 419.

McKay AJ, Patel RK, Majeed A. Strategies for tobacco control in India: a systematic review. PLoS One, 2015. 10(4): p. e0122610.

WHO. Prevalence of tobacco smoking. 2015 [cited 2016 10 October 2016]; Available from:

Government Office, Government resolution on National Tobacco Control Policy 2000-2010. 2000: Medical Publishing House.

Prime Minister, Directive 12/2007/CT-TTg on strengthening tobacco control activities. 2007: Hanoi.

Prime Minister, Decision No. 1315/QĐ-TTg on the Ratification of the Plan for the Implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. 2009: Hanoi.

National Assembly, Law no 09/2012/QH13 on prevention and control of tobacco harms National Assembly, Editor. 2013: Hanoi.

Government Office, Decision 229/QD-TTg dated January 25, 2013 to approve the National Strategy for prevention and control of tobacco’s harmful effects through 2020. 2013, Government Office: Hanoi.

Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. 2000, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Vietnam Ministry of Health, et al., Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Viet Nam. 2010.

Hyland A, Barnoya J, Corral JE. Smoke-free air policies: past, present and future. Tobacco Control, 2012. 21: p. 154-161.

Nan Y, Xi Z, Yang Y, Wang LL, Tu MW, Wang JJ, Jiang Y. The 2015 China Adult Tobacco Survey: exposure to second-hand smoke among adults aged 15 and above and their support to policy on banning smoking in public places. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi, 2016. 37(6): p. 810-815.

Vietnam News, Large-scale violations of public smoking ban. 2016.

The Diplomat, Vietnam’s Tobacco Problem. 2014.

Kashiwabara M, Armada F, Yoshimi I. Kanagawa, Japan's tobacco control legislation: a breakthrough? Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2011. 12(8): p. 1909-1916.

Man Chun Kuen, et al., Effectiveness of the smoking policies in Singapore (National Tobacco Control Programme) to reduce smoking prevalence (Post trip report). 2015, City University of Hong Kong: Hong Kong.

Hoang Anh PT, Thu le T, Ross H, Quynh Anh N, Linh BN, Minh NT. Direct and indirect costs of smoking in Vietnam. Tobacco Control, 2016. 25(1): p. 96-100.

Aherrera A, Çarkoğlu A, Hayran M, Ergör G, Eirüder T, Kaplan B, Susan J, Zheng L, Cohen JE, Navas-Acien A. Factors that influence attitude and enforcement of the smoke-free law in Turkey: a survey of hospitality venue owners and employees. Tobacco Control, 2016.

Yang T, Abdullah AS, Li L, Rockett IR, Lin Y, Ying J, Guo W, Wu D, Li M. Public place smoke-free regulations, secondhand smoke exposure and related beliefs, awareness, attitudes, and practices among Chinese urban residents. International Journal of Enviromental Research and Public Health, 2013. 10(6): p. 2370-2383.

Rashid A, Manan AA, Yahya N, Ibrahim L. The support for smoke free policy and how it is influenced by tolerance to smoking - experience of a developing country. PLoS One, 2014. 9(10): p. e109429.

Dao TM, Hoang VM, Le TH, Kim BG, Le TT, Pham TQ, Hsia J. Attitudes toward nonsmoking policies and tobacco tax increases: a cross-sectional study among Vietnamese adults. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 2015. 27(2): p. NP947-57.

Cheng KW, Glantz SA, Lightwood JM. Association between smokefree laws and voluntary smokefree-home rules. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2011. 41(6): p. 566-572.

Kruger J, Jama A, Homa DM, Babb SD, King BA. Smoke-free home and vehicle rules by tobacco use status among US adults. Preventive Medicine, 2015. 78: p. 9-13.

Thrasher JF, Boado M, Sebrié EM, Bianco E. Smoke-free policies and the social acceptability of smoking in Uruguay and Mexico: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 2009. 11(6): p. 591-599.

Chaiken S, Wood W, Eagly A. Principles of persuasion. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, ed. Higgins E and Kruglanski A. 1996, New York: Guilford.

Kaufman MR, Merritt AP, Rimbatmaja R, Cohen JE. 'Excuse me, sir. Please don't smoke here'. A qualitative study of social enforcement of smoke-free policies in Indonesia. Health Policy and Planning, 2015. 30(8): p. 995-1002.

Hood NE, Ferketich AK, Klein EG, Wewers ME, Pirie P. Individual, social, and environmental factors associated with support for smoke-free housing policies among subsidized multiunit housing tenants. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 2013. 15(6): p. 1075-1083.