Keywords
Height
Estimation
Accuracy
Abstract
Background: Height measurement is one of the common essential anthropometric measurements in clinical pediatrics. The most accurate method of determining a child height is to measure the height. However, in emergency situations and some resource limited settings, obtaining the actual height of a child may not be feasible hence the need to estimate. The most common age-based formulae for height estimation in children is 6n + 77 where n = age in years. The accuracy of this height estimation formulae has not been assessed in developing setting like ours with high prevalence of malnutrition. This study therefore sought to evaluate the accuracy of the height estimation formula in children in communities across Enugu southeast Nigeria. Method: Children 2-12 years old who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled over 12 months from three of the 17 Local Government Area of Enugu State. Height was measured using a standard stadiometer and estimated height was calculated 6n + 77. Data collected was analyzed using SPSS. Result: Of the 4046 children enrolled, majority (86.1%) were of normal height for age while 2.6% were stunted. The formula underestimated height of children in younger age bracket and overestimated height in older children. Overall, the estimated height using the formula was within ±10% agreement of the actual height of surveyed children in 77.0% of children surveyed. Conclusion: The 6n + 77 formula is a reasonable but not entirely accurate for height estimation for children in our setting. Keywords: Children, Height, Estimation, Accuracy
References
2. Diacon AH, Koegelenberg CFN, Klüsmann KJC, Bolliger CT. Challenges in the estimation of tidal volume settings in critical care units. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:1670–1671.
3. Keane V. Assessment of growth. In: Nelson textbook of pediatrics, 18 th edition.
4. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nnewi.
5. Nigerian Population Commission. State and local government demographic profile: 1991-2010, Abuja.
6. Fetuga MB, Ogunlesi TA, Adekanmbi AF, Alabi AD. Nutritional status of semi-urban Nigerian school children using the 2007 WHO Reference population. West African Journal of Medicine 2011;30:331-36.
7. Definition of Frankfort horizontal plane. Available online at http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Frankfort+horizontal+plane (June 25, 2017).
8. WHO. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert committee. Technical report series No 854. Available at www.who.int/childgrowth/publications/physical_status. last assessed (June 20, 2018)
9. Oyedeji GA. Socioeconomic and cultural background of hospitalized children in Ilesa, Nigeria. Nig J Paediatr 1985; 12:111-117
10. Katzmarzyk PT. Anthropometric indicators in relation to the gold standards In. Bray GA, Bouchard C, editorsHandbook of Obesity Epidemiology, Etiology, and Physiopathology 2014 3rd edBoca RatonCRC Press Taylor & Francis Group:37-44.
11. Zind BJ, Determining drug dosages by height: applying a model made for coastal children in Papua New Guinea to children from the highlands P N G Med J 1992 35:194-96.
12. Eke CB, Ubesie AC, Ibe BC. Comparison of actual (measured) weights and heights with the standard formula methods of estimation among children in Enugu. Niger J Paed 2014;41(4): 307-311.
13. Aline Jelenkovic, Reijo Sund, Yoon-Mi Hur, Yoshie Yoko. Genetic and environmental influences on height from infancy to early adulthood: An individual-based pooled analysis of 45 twin cohorts. Scientific Reports 2016; 6: 28496