Prevalence of rubella antibodies: comparison between women with pregnancy induced by infertility treatments and those with spontaneous pregnancy
pdf

Keywords

rubella antibody titer
prevalence
infertility treatments
Japan

Abstract

The great rubella epidemic has been sometimes occurred in Japan. We compared the prevalence of rubella antibody in women with pregnancies conceived by infertility treatments and those conceived spontaneously. We reviewed the obstetric records of the Japanese nulliparous women with pregnancies conceived by infertility treatments who had deliveries at Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital from 2014 to 2018. There were no significant differences in the rate of women whose rubella antibody titer < 8 or < 32, respectively between the 2 groups with pregnancies conceived by infertility treatments and conceived spontaneously (titer < 8: 4.1 vs. 3.4%, p = 0.58: titer < 32: 17.3 vs. 15.3%, p = 0.45). It is necessary to thoroughly implement the preconception care concerning the risk of congenital rubella infection for women who are undergoing infertility treatments especially in Japanese obstetricians.

https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2020.61.4.1208
pdf

References

References

Plotkin SA. Rubella eradication. Vaccine, 2001; 19(25-26): 3311-3319.

Reef SE, Plotkin SA. Rubella vaccine. Vaccines 6th ed. Elsevier, Philadelphia. 2013. pp.688-717.

Mason WH. Rubella. Nelson textbook of pediatrics 19th ed. Elsevier, Philadelphia. 2011. pp.1075-1178.

Ueda K: Epidemiology of rubella and congenital rubella syndrome in Japan before 1989. Vaccine. 2016; 34(16): 1971-1974. doi: 10.1016/j.

The National Institute of Infectious Disease: Emergency information on rubella outbreak (2019). https://www.niid.go.jp/niid/images/epi/rubella/2019/rubella190109.pdf Accessed on 01/16/2019.

Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Traveler’s health: rubella in Japan. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/notices/alert/rubella-japan Accessed on 01/16/2019.

Berghella V, Buchanan E, Pereira L, Baxter JK: Preconception care. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010; 65(2): 119-131. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e3181d0c358.

Ergenoğlu AM, Yeniel AO, Yildirim N, Kazandi M, Akercan F, Sağol S.l: Rubella vaccination during the preconception period or in pregnancy and perinatal and fetal outcomes. Turk J Pediatr. 2012; 54(3): 230-233.

Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Assisted reproductive technology (in Japanese). http://www.jaog.or.jp/ Accessed on 01/16/ 2019.

Ozaki T, Nishimura N, Gotoh K, et al: Phases 3 and 4 immunization immunogenicity with combined measles-rubella vaccine (in Japanese). Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 2011; 85: 250-255.

Kato M, Suzuki S: History of assisted reproductive technology and Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy. J Clin Med Res. 2016; 8(3): 244–245. doi: 10.14740/jocmr2444w.

Mitsubishi Tanabe Phama: Freeze-dried live attenuated rubella vaccine (in Japanese). http://www.info.pmda.go.jp/downfiles/ph/PDF/630144_631340BD1037_1_26.pdf Accessed on 01/16/2019.